The NAV logic in the Wilco 737 is a bit buggy to say the least. In LVL CHG mode on descent, it tends to level off then pitch up before diving again. Also in LNAV mode sometimes it moves around laterally a bit more than one would expect. PMDG LNAV and VNAV logic seems better. Both aircraft have their bugs but ultimately both are very nice to fly.
In descent, I tend to use Vertical Speed or VNAV on the Wilco, because of the issues with LVL CHG, but I nearly always use either LVL CHG or VNAV in the PMDG, but never vertical speed. In the above image, I am descending to FL80 in vertical speed mode at a VS of -950fpm at 250IAS.
I find the frame rates in the virtual cockpit of the Wilco to be better than the PMDG, especially when using the TrackIr device.
Another issue on Squawkbox is the sudden appearance of aircraft either directly above or below me with TCAS shouting "CLIMB CLIMB" or "MAINTAIN VERTICAL SPEED" and then "CLEAR OF CONFLICT". This seems to happen every time someone connects to the network within a certain range. Very annoying. Otherwise, the TCAS on the 737 classics (Wilco) is good.
Another issue worth mentioning is the Wilco Airbus A320 with its faulty LNAV capabilities. Sometimes on a SID out of an airport, the plane seems to suddenly decide it has missed a waypoint and tries to turn back again. Very dangerous if it happened in real life. One has to be alert to this possibility, keeping the LEGS page of the FMGC open to bring the next waypoint to the top, or else selecting the heading by pulling the knob and matching the heading with the SID path. I think this is one Wilco could easily release a patch for, no?
Also on the Wilco A320 is the issue of top of descent calculation. If you add an arrival or change arrival (STAR) or runway, the FMGC in the Wilco A320 DOES NOT recalculate TOD. Pity. They did everything else so well. It's a nice bus to fly but sometimes the couple of small faults can put one off.